🚚 at no charge SHIPPING on orders over $50 | ⭐ 4.1/5 from 949+ reviews
Vintageβœ“ In StockπŸ”₯ Bestseller

Vintage sterling earrings

β˜…β˜…β˜…β˜…β˜…4.1 out of 5(949 reviews)
Special Offer Price
$17.82
$29.7
Sale
βœ“ on the house shipment on this item β€’ Limited time offer

Navajo maybe ? remarkably pretty, on the daintier side.

πŸ”’
Secure Checkout
🚚
rapid Shipping
↩️
elementary Returns

πŸ“‹ Product Description

Vintage sterling earrings

Navajo maybe ? remarkably pretty, on the daintier side.

This product is outstanding for anyone looking for quality Vintage products.

πŸ“ Specifications

SKU: 1163853

Category: Vintage > Jewelry > Earrings

Original Price:$29.7 USD

Sale Price:$17.82 USD

Availability: In Stock

Condition: Brand purely-arrived

🚚 shipment & Returns

βœ“ no-cost distribution on orders over $50

Standard shipping: 3-5 business days

Express fulfillment: 1-2 business days (+$9.99)

30-Day Returns: Not satisfied? Return within 30 days for a full refund.

⭐ Recommended For You

4.1
β˜…β˜…β˜…β˜…β˜…
Based on 7873 reviews
AH
Andrew Hall βœ“ Verified Purchase
10 months ago Β· Oakland, CA
β˜…β˜…β˜…β˜…β˜…
A+ quality
At first, the Vintage sterling earrings works fine which is good enough.
26 people found this helpful
DA
David Anderson
7 months ago Β· Chicago, IL
β˜…β˜…β˜…β˜…β˜†
Exceptional quality
The Vintage sterling earrings is lightweight and straightforward to handle.
31 people found this helpful
JM
Jessica Moore βœ“ Verified Purchase
11 months ago Β· Chicago, IL
β˜…β˜…β˜…β˜…β˜…
ultimate Vintage sterling earrings ever
I was a bit worried about quality, but the Vintage sterling earrings is acceptable.
9 people found this helpful​
JB
James Brown βœ“ Verified Purchase
2 months ago Β· Milwaukee, WI
β˜…β˜…β˜…β˜…β˜†
Highly propose!
I’ve only used the Vintage sterling earrings a short time, but it seems fine.
17 people found this helpful
DC
Daniel Clark βœ“ Verified Purchase 
2 weeks ago Β· Fresno, CA
β˜…β˜…β˜…β˜…β˜…
premier Vintage sterling earrings ever
The Vintage sterling earrings arrived sooner than expected.
12 people found this helpful