🚚 at no charge SHIPPING on orders over $50 | ⭐ 4.9/5 from 213+ reviews
Vintageβœ“ In StockπŸ”₯ Bestseller

Vintage tapestry 1960s square fabric

β˜…β˜…β˜…β˜…β˜…4.9 out of 5(213 reviews)
Special Offer Price
$36
$60
Sale
βœ“ on the house shipment on this item β€’ Limited time offer

7ft x 33inches wide. Stuff thick hard tapestry fabric.

πŸ”’
Secure Checkout
🚚
hasty Shipping
↩️
hassle-at no charge Returns

πŸ“‹ Product Description

Vintage tapestry 1960s square fabric

7ft x 33inches wide. Stuff thick hard tapestry fabric.

This product is outstanding for anyone looking for quality Vintage products.

πŸ“ Specifications

SKU: 1015381

Category: Vintage > Supplies > Fabric

Original Price:$60 USD

Sale Price:$36 USD

Availability: In Stock

Condition: Brand recent

🚚 distribution & Returns

βœ“ on the house distribution on orders over $50

Standard fulfillment: 3-5 business days​

Express shipping: 1-2 business days (+$9.99)

30-Day Returns: Not satisfied? Return within 30 days for a full refund.

⭐ Recommended For You

4.9
β˜…β˜…β˜…β˜…β˜…
Based on 8479 reviews
AP
Adam Parker
5 months ago Β· Cleveland, OH
β˜…β˜…β˜…β˜…β˜…
remarkable Vintage tapestry 1960s square fabric!
In daily use, it is uncomplicated to use and it’s fine overall. No setup issues.
26 people found this helpful
ET
Emily Thompson βœ“ Verified Purchase
3 months ago Β· Seattle, WA
β˜…β˜…β˜…β˜…β˜…
only what I wanted
The Vintage tapestry 1960s square fabric arrived without damage.
15 people found this helpful
JB
James Brown βœ“ Verified Purchase
1 month ago Β· Boston, MA
β˜…β˜…β˜…β˜…β˜…
truly impressed
the Vintage tapestry 1960s square fabric feels solid and I don’t regret it.
50 people found this helpful
DA
David Anderson βœ“ Verified Purchase
1 month ago Β· Denver, CO
β˜…β˜…β˜…β˜…β˜…
So happy with this
After some use, the Vintage tapestry 1960s square fabric does its job which is good enough. shipment was normal.
41 people found this helpful
RS
Rachel Scott βœ“ Verified Purchase
11 months ago Β· Milwaukee, WI
β˜…β˜…β˜…β˜…β˜†
truly pleased
To be fair, it performs as expected and it’s fine overall. Works fine so far.
3 people found this helpful